A boardroom review gives the table to evaluate their performance in a thorough manner. It helps tables identify weaknesses in their leadership relationships and their culture as well as other aspects of longevity. It also helps ensure that the table members who pay for table memberships are able to perform their responsibilities.
This research field is still evolving and many problems remain. The first is that the current evidence from empirical studies is mixed on how dissent influences boards and their function. While some studies show positive (Zona 2016) and curvilinear effects, others report negative (Brown, Buchholtz and Butts 2019) as well as mixed or non-significant results (Heemskerk, Heemskerk, and Wats, 2015; Minichilli et al. 2012) relations between dissent and the performance of a board’s tasks.
Furthermore, the current research is lacking a deeper understanding of what influences the dynamics of disagreement. Future research should create a more integrated theoretical approach to understand this phenomenon of governance. This could include the use of techniques that use configuration (Federo and Saz-Carranza (2018); Schiell, Lewellyn & Yan 2023) to help researchers better understand how board attributes, processes and contexts relate essential and sufficient causality.
Finaly, some studies use boardroom review an esoteric definition of discord, but don’t provide precise measurement methods. This means that these studies are prone to measurement errors. Therefore, it would be important to come up with more reliable and precise dissent measurement techniques.